CASE FILE
TCU-617

Joe Mack’s $547 Million Merchant Cash Advance Lie: A True Crime Case

VERIFIED SOURCES 992 PRIMARY DOCUMENTS
Financial Crime
CASE FILE INVESTIGATED

LISTEN TO THE FULL INVESTIGATION

0:00 / 0:00
Player not working? Listen on
Subscribe on Substack

LISTEN & SUBSCRIBE

Available on all major podcast platforms

Case Narrative

Complete written investigation summary

Joe Mack’s $547 Million Lie: How Joseph LaForte Built a Criminal Empire on a Stolen Name

Between 2012 and 2020, a twice-convicted felon named Joseph LaForte raised approximately $547 million from more than 1,200 investors by hiding his identity behind the alias “Joe Mack.” His company — Complete Business Solutions Group, operating publicly as Par Funding — claimed to be a legitimate merchant cash advance lender offering annual returns of 12 to 44 percent. The reality, according to federal court documents in Case 2:23-cr-00198-MAK in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, was a RICO enterprise that combined securities fraud, wire fraud, tax evasion, extortionate debt collection, witness tampering, and actual physical violence against a court-appointed attorney. On March 26, 2025, Judge Mark A. Kearney sentenced Joseph LaForte to 186 months — 15 and a half years — in federal prison and ordered him to pay more than $314 million in restitution. It is one of the longest sentences for financial fraud in Pennsylvania history.

How Did Joseph LaForte Conceal His Criminal History to Build Par Funding?

Joseph LaForte was not a first-time offender when he founded Par Funding. According to the government’s sentencing filings, LaForte had already pleaded guilty to a $14 million real estate Ponzi scheme in New York in 2006, and again to an illegal gambling conspiracy in 2009. Released from his second federal sentence, he founded Complete Business Solutions Group — which would become Par Funding — in approximately October 2011, while he was still serving federal supervised release. To hide his identity and his criminal record from investors and regulators, LaForte incorporated the company in his wife Lisa McElhone’s name and operated under the alias “Joe Mack,” also using variations including “Joe Macki,” “Joe Mackie,” and “Joe McElhone” — borrowing his wife’s maiden name. According to the amended second superseding indictment, LaForte’s entire business model was built on one foundational lie: that “Joe Mack,” a successful entrepreneur, had built this company from scratch.

What Was Par Funding’s Promise to Investors — and What Was the Reality?

Par Funding raised capital by selling promissory notes that promised investors annual returns of 12 to 44 percent. The company’s stated purpose was to advance money to small businesses — merchant cash advances — that could not qualify for traditional bank loans, and to generate income by charging those businesses exorbitant rates of return exceeding 30 percent. According to the government’s sentencing memorandum for James LaForte, roughly half of Par Funding’s merchant cash advance portfolio consisted of only five customers, four of which had posted year-after-year negative net income. When those merchants couldn’t pay, Par Funding would “reload” them — offering new advances that the merchant would use partly to repay the old debt, burying them deeper while creating the appearance of a performing portfolio. By no later than 2016, according to court documents, Par Funding’s business was not generating enough income to repay investors while also covering operating expenses, including the tens of millions of dollars LaForte and co-defendants were paying themselves annually. To keep the lights on, LaForte needed a constant infusion of new investor money — a structure the court later confirmed was a classic Ponzi scheme. From 2015 through mid-2020, court records show Joseph LaForte caused Par Funding to pay him and his wife more than $120 million in fraudulent proceeds.

How Did Par Funding Use Violence Against Merchants Who Fell Behind?

When merchants defaulted on their cash advance obligations, Par Funding did not sue them in civil court. According to the amended second superseding indictment and the government’s sentencing memorandum for James LaForte, the LaForte brothers and their outside enforcer, Renato “Gino” Gioe, used direct threats of violence to shake down delinquent borrowers. James LaForte told one victim — identified as C.K., whose barbershop had fallen behind — that he had “experience with torching cars and kicking people’s teeth in,” and threatened to have C.K. and his eight-year-old son killed if he didn’t pay $10,000 per week. James LaForte told another victim, J.P., that he would kill J.P. and his entire family if the debt was not paid. Gioe, acting under Joseph LaForte’s direction, extended similar threats to other merchant borrowers across multiple states. According to court documents, it was this pattern of violent debt collection — and the merchants who sought legal help to escape it — that ultimately brought the case to federal attention.

What Evidence Did Federal Investigators Find Against the Par Funding Defendants?

The collapse began on July 24, 2020, when the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed an emergency enforcement action in the Southern District of Florida and secured an asset freeze, with Ryan Stumphauzer appointed as court-ordered receiver. On August 7, 2020, the FBI arrested Joseph LaForte at his home and discovered seven loaded firearms. According to court records, CFO Joseph Cole Barleta maintained a laptop containing detailed financial records tracking the fraud to the penny — $404,737,299 in outstanding principal at the time of the SEC freeze. Investigators also documented a series of events showing the criminal enterprise’s escalating desperation: including a spy camera deployed at a King of Prussia investor dinner, recorded phone calls, and electronic communications. On February 28, 2023, while the civil receivership was actively clawing back assets from the LaForte family, James LaForte ambushed Philadelphia attorney Gaetan Alfano — who had been working to evict the LaFortes from their Haverford estate — on a Center City street, striking him from behind with a hard object and leaving him with seven staples in his scalp. Federal agents arrested James LaForte six days later. An index card found in his pocket contained the names, addresses, and phone numbers of government witnesses he had already begun threatening by phone that same evening.

What Charges Were Filed in the Par Funding RICO Case?

On May 18, 2023, a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania returned a superseding indictment against Joseph LaForte, James LaForte, and CFO Joseph Cole Barleta under Case No. 2:23-cr-00198-MAK. The amended second superseding indictment, filed February 26, 2024, charged the defendants with racketeering conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), 19 counts of wire fraud, one count of securities fraud, conspiracy to use extortionate means to collect a debt, seven counts of use of extortionate means to collect a debt, tax evasion, false tax returns, 12 counts of failure to collect and pay over employment taxes, perjury, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, and witness retaliation. On June 1, 2023, Judge Lloyd ordered Joseph LaForte detained pretrial after the government demonstrated he had threatened to shoot a witness and his wife while already on pretrial release. All three principal defendants pleaded guilty in September and October 2024.

What Were the Sentences for the Par Funding Defendants?

On January 21, 2025, Judge Kearney issued a finding of fact and conclusions of law determining the actual fraud loss at $288,395,088 — reduced from the $404,737,299 outstanding principal after crediting collateral recovered by the receivership. On March 13, 2025, James LaForte was sentenced to 137 months — 11 and a half years — in federal prison and ordered to pay $2.49 million in restitution. Thirteen days later, on March 26, 2025, Joseph LaForte received 186 months — 15 and a half years — along with more than $314 million in restitution and $120 million in forfeiture. CFO Joseph Cole Barleta was sentenced to 66 months on June 2, 2025, with $302.7 million in restitution. Outside enforcer Renato Gioe, who became a cooperating witness, received 18 months on April 17, 2025. Lisa McElhone, LaForte’s wife who had served as the company’s nominal owner, was sentenced on October 23, 2025 to one day in custody and 60 days of home confinement — prosecutors acknowledged she had “nothing to do with day-to-day operations.” The final Par Funding prosecution closed the same day.

Where Is Joseph LaForte Now, and What Happened to the Investors?

Joseph LaForte, 54 at the time of sentencing, is serving his 15½-year federal sentence and will not be eligible for release until he is nearly 70. According to the court-appointed receivership, as of February 2026 approximately $196 million had been distributed to investors. The receiver projects investors will ultimately recover approximately 80 cents on every dollar lost — an unusually high recovery rate for a Ponzi scheme, made possible in part through settlements with the Chehebar family (Rainbow Stores, which had invested approximately $50 million) and the law firm Eckert Seamans, whose attorney had helped structure Par Funding’s investor funds without proper SEC registration. Early investors who received interest payments before the collapse may face clawback proceedings. The Par Funding case is also cited in 2026 Congressional debates about regulating the merchant cash advance industry, which remains largely unregulated. For the 1,200+ investors who trusted “Joe Mack” with their savings, the recovery is meaningful — but it came only because the violence that LaForte ordered to protect his empire ultimately exposed it.

Want the Consumer Protection Deep-Dive? I wrote a companion piece on GetOutOfDebt.org analyzing the fraud pattern — including the 5 red flags investors missed and how to protect yourself from the same scheme.

Primary Court Documents

Verifiable case records used in this investigation

Indictment
Case No. 2:23-cr-00198-MAK

Amended Second Superseding Indictment — United States v. LaForte et al. (RICO, wire fraud, securities fraud, extortionate debt collection, tax, perjury, obstruction, tampering, retaliation)

Docket Date February 26, 2024
Doc # 136
Affiant Matthew T. Newcomer, AUSA, Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Verify on PACER
Sentencing Memorandum
Case No. 2:23-cr-00198-5

Government's Sentencing Memorandum — James LaForte (RICO, assault of attorney Gaetan Alfano, extortionate debt collection, witness retaliation)

Docket Date March 3, 2025
Doc # 319
Affiant Samuel S. Dalke, AUSA
Verify on PACER
Judgment
Case No. 2:23-cr-00198-MAK

Memorandum — Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law re: Fraud Loss Determination for Sentencing — Judge Kearney sets actual fraud loss at $288,395,088

Docket Date January 21, 2025
Doc # 309
Affiant Mark A. Kearney, U.S. District Judge
Verify on PACER

Full Episode Transcript

Complete verbatim text • Searchable • Accessible

[0:03] It's November 21st, 2019, and it's a Thursday evening at the Sheraton Hotel. [0:09] In King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. About 300 people fill a banquet room, mostly middle-aged, mostly middle-class. Teachers, plumbers, and retirees. And they're here because someone promised them a free steak dinner at Ruth's Chris. And a chance to learn about an investment returning 10 to 14 percent a year. Or, in some cases, up to 44 percent. At the front of the room, a man takes the microphone. He's confident. He's relaxed. Next, he tells the crowd he started the company eight years ago with about $500,000 of his own money. He says they're probably the most profitable cash advance company in the United States. Maybe the world. Pound for pound, he tells them they can trust him. That real lives are behind these investments. And that means a lot to him since day one. [1:19] According to court documents filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, every word of it was a lie. He never invested a single dollar. The company was hemorrhaging tens of millions of dollars a year. And the man at the microphone? He was a twice-convicted felon who'd done time for grand larceny, money laundering, and illegal gambling. His real name was Joseph Laforte. But nobody in that room knew that. Because sitting in the crowd, in a seat just like everyone else's, was a man holding a car key fob he'd bought on Amazon for $49. But it wasn't a key fob. [2:16] This is True Crime Cases You Haven't Heard. I'm Steve Rode, and for 30 years I worked as an investigative writer chasing financial criminals from Ponzi schemers to corporate fraudsters. I also spent years in emergency services, two years as a police dispatcher, surveillance photography with local law enforcement, and I was a chief pilot for public safety flight operations. But this story really stuck with me because over the years, I have seen so many good people and small businesses fall into the business cash advance trap. So, yeah, this story had me from moment one. [2:59] I need to tell you this. The events described in this episode are based on federal court documents, sworn testimony, government filings, and credible published reporting. Joseph and James LaForte are convicted defendants who pleaded guilty. All other individuals referenced are described according to their legal status, as established in court records at the time of the events. James LaForte faces a separate pending federal indictment in the Eastern District of New York. Stephen O'Dozer's prior bank fraud conviction was later pardoned by presidential action. His legal status is described as it stood during the events covered here. No one charged with the incidents involving attorneys Justin Proper, Shane Heskin, or SEC attorney Amy Berlin has been criminally convicted of those acts. [3:58] This is the story of a half-billion-dollar fraud built on a fake name, a prison friendship, and the promise of easy money. It's the story of how one man stole from 1,600 investors while threatening borrowers with car bombs, cement shoes, and the kidnapping of their children. And it's the story of what it cost the people who believed in him. Hey, if you're new here, hit subscribe wherever you're listening. And if you want the case files and court documents behind future stories, be sure you subscribe at truecrimeunheard.com. Subscribers there get the court documents whenever a new show drops. That's truecrimeunheard.com. [4:56] Before I tell you about the man who took their money, I want you to meet the people he took it from. According to the restitution chart filed at sentencing, it was a spreadsheet listing every victim by name and dollar amount. The investors in PAR funding were ordinary people like you and me. 1,600 of them, according to court filings. Maybe more. They came from Philadelphia, from the suburbs, from Colorado and Florida, and everywhere in between. They were drawn by promises that sounded reasonable. Hey, just park your savings here and earn 10-14% a year. Some funds advertised even higher. And the pitch came through seminars, through financial advisors, through word of mouth and backyard fences. A friend of a friend had done well, the checks cleared on time, and the statements looked clean. What could go wrong? [6:03] Robert Hyralak was 70 years old, living in Boothwin, Pennsylvania. He was a retiree. He put his savings into PAR funding through one of its investment vehicles. As of May 2025, according to the Pennsylvania Inquiry, he'd gotten back about $22,000 and was still owed $32,000 more. He was working part-time jobs just to cover his bills. Ron Grazivna was 62. He invested roughly $600,000. He told reporters, And they fooled a lot of smart people. [6:54] Then there were the families who lost everything. The restitution chart shows the Marcus family, Harold Marcus Personally, Harold Marcus IRA, Harold Marcus Roth IRA, Harold Marcus Real Estate Trust, Myra Marcus Residual Benefit Trust, Marcus Family Investments. Six entries, one address, and every financial instrument they had. And according to court filings, their combined loss was approximately $2.6 million. And the distribution received as of sentencing? Zero. And there's the Guile family of Aspen, Colorado. Five investment vehicles. One address on Spruce Street. Approximately $8 million. dollars. Distribution? Zero. These were the people who trusted Joseph LaForte. They just didn't know his name. [8:04] Joseph LaForte was born 1971 in Brooklyn, New York, and according to Philadelphia Magazine's 2024 investigation titled Lone Wolves by Craig McCoy. Laforte grew up in a family with alleged ties to the Gambino crime family. His grandfather was known as Joe the Cat and was identified in Philadelphia Magazine's reporting as a reputed Gambino lieutenant. And according to the same investigation in 1987. The mutilated body of an enemy of John Gotti was found in one of the grandfather's Staten Island buildings. [8:49] Laforte's criminal career started early, around 2000. According to court records and victim complaints to regulators, he extorted a contractor named Joseph Zarrilli out of $92,000. The contractor later wrote to regulators, I certainly would like my money back and not have to worry that some organized crime person is going to kill me like they intimidated. In 2005, the Laforte family, Joseph, and his brother James and their parents were arrested on Long Island for a real estate fraud scheme involving at least $12 million, fake law firms, and proceeds spent on Bentley's, Rolls Royces, and Mercedes Benzes. According to the Nassau County District Attorney, it was one of the largest fraud schemes the office had seen. In October 2006, Joseph Laforte pleaded guilty to grand larceny, money laundering, and conspiracy. In December 2009, he pleaded guilty again, this time to illegal gambling conspiracy. [10:06] He went to federal prison at FCI Farriton, New Jersey, and it was there, in a cell block in the fall of 2009. That he met the man who would become the most important hire of his career. Renato Joey goes by Gino, a former bodybuilder, tanned, tattooed, muscle-bound. At the time of their meeting, the FBI would later identify Joey as a reputed associate of the Gambino crime family. A characterization Joey and his attorneys have long denied. [10:52] They were cellmates. And I want you to hold that detail because a single email written six years later would reveal exactly how this criminal empire was built. But I'll come back to that. La Forte was released from prison in February 2011. According to the Criminal Judgment and Bureau of Prison Records, he was placed on federal supervised release, meaning he was still technically in the custody of the federal government. [11:27] And that same year, he founded PAR Funding. [11:33] A twice-convicted felon on supervised release, started a financial company. He incorporated it in his wife's name, Lisa McAlhom, a St. Joseph's University graduate who ran a nail salon in Old City, Philadelphia, called Lacquer Lounge. She was listed as sole officer, president, and CEO. And here's that email. A 2016 message from Laforte to his CFO entered into evidence, quote, Add Lisa, my wife, to a position to get these guys used to seeing her name. Give her a title, unquote. [12:25] That's how you build a half-billion-dollar empire when you're a convicted felon who can't put his name on anything. You put someone else's name on everything. Prosecutors would later call her a proxy. She rarely set foot in the office. And Laforte? He operated entirely under the name Joe Mack. According to his guilty plea transcript, he hired a New York reputation manager to bury online news articles about his prior convictions. He never appeared in corporate documents. At his September 2024 guilty plea, when the judge asked him if he'd used any other name, his answer under oath was two words. Joe Mack. [13:19] Leforte couldn't sell directly to investors. He was invisible. So he found Dean Vagnacci. Vagnacci was a Philadelphia-area financial advisor. He was a regular on KYW Radio and Talk Radio 1210. According to Philadelphia Magazine, he ran investment seminars advertised with free Ruth's Chris Steakhouse Dinners, the same format as that King of Prussia dinner. He raised more than $100 million for PAR funding through a series of vehicles called ABFP income funds. These were part of what the government described as a network of more than 40 agent Shells with names like Sherpa Income Fund, Capricorn Income Fund, and Capital Source 200, Each one sold its own promissory notes to investors and then funneled the money to PAR funding. According to the Rowan University academic paper analyzing this case, this two-layered structure meant investors were buying unregistered securities through feeder funds, two steps removed from the actual loans. Most of them had no idea at all. [14:47] According to SEC civil enforcement filings, Vagnacis was aware of Laforte's criminal history. And according to Philadelphia Magazine's investigation, when later asked why he didn't tell investors, he said, hey, everybody deserves a second chance. He was never criminally charged, and he settled with the SEC for $5 million. bucks. By 2024, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer, Vagnazzi was driving a FedEx truck at age 55. His cars had been repossessed, his insurance license was stripped, the soccer benches with his name on them had been scrubbed. Par funding claimed to be the type of company in the debt world known as a merchant cash advance company. We call them MCAs. Now, that's a legal financial product where a company buys a smaller business's future receivables at a discount and provides immediate cash. [15:54] Sounds logical. Parr told investors it was making money on these deals and passing the profits back to them at 10-14% annual interest rate. [16:07] According to federal court findings in Miami, the actual business generated only $39.9 million in net cash flow over nine years of operation. That wasn't even enough to cover operating expenses, let alone pay investors. Beginning in 2016, according to Judge Mark Carney's fraud loss analysis, new investor money was used to pay old investors their interest. The hallmark, the court wrote, of a Ponzi scheme. Between 2016 and 2020, annual deficits reached as high as $70 million. And in that same period, according to court findings, Laforte, McElhone, and their CFO paid themselves and fellow insiders more than $150 million. [17:08] At its peak, Parr funding employed 70 people out of a leather-couched office in Old City, Philadelphia. Laforte ran every aspect of the operation, but his name appeared nowhere. Not on the letterhead, not on the corporate filings, not on a single business card. 70 employees, $547 million in investor money, and the man running all of it was a ghost, called Joe Mack. [17:50] The investors had no idea. None. The true default rate on merchant loans was approximately 20%. About one in five borrowers couldn't repay. And Laforte told investors, hey, it's less than 1%. We're doing great. When merchants defaulted, PAR didn't write them off. No, they offered reload agreements. knew larger loans that reset the repayment clock. And the receiver's attorney, Gatan Alfano, would later describe it in open court as a fraud within a fraud within a Ponzi scheme. Internally, there was a saying, A rolling loan gathers no loss. The following, I need to stop here because I want you to understand something about the people on the other end of these loans. I've spent 30 years as an investigative writer covering financial predators, and I've seen this pattern over and over, and we've talked about it in past episodes. Businesses that take merchant cash advances aren't shopping for the best deals. They're the ones the bank's already said no to. They're behind on payroll. They're two months from closing, and that's exactly who companies like Par Funding target. [19:18] Because desperate people looking for easy loans don't read the fine print, and they don't ask why the interest rate is 400%. They just need to make it through the next month. So what you're about to hear, the threats, the violence, and the intimidation, Keep in mind that the people on the receiving end weren't deadbeats. They were small business owners who'd already been failed by the system before Laforte ever got his hands on them. And then he sent his people to their homes. [19:56] Now, remember that prison cellmate? This is where a Ponzi scheme becomes something else entirely. According to FBI Special Agent John Murray's testimony at sentencing, Renato Gino, Joey, visited over 700 merchants at Laforte's direction. Many of those visits were unannounced, and during some of them, Laforte watched live on FaceTime from his home in Pennsylvania, directing the confrontations in real time. At a Florida business owned by a man named Jose Parea, Joey showed up and didn't leave. According to court documents, the standoff lasted eight long hours. Eight hours! At the end of it, Parea physically removed the Rolex from his wrist and handed it to Joey. One of Perea's employees texted Laforte afterwards, Please call off the hounds. And by that, I mean that animal you sent down here. [21:13] Joey texted Laforte at 624 in the morning after showing up unannounced at another merchant's business. By the way, Radiant Mike is scared. Could not believe I arrived. Laforte texted a collector about a different merchant. Hit Radiant hard with AR letter. First thing, that will buckle their knees. And then he said, I will pound them with fury if they keep this up. But the threats went far beyond intimidation. [21:52] On November 7th, 2019, two weeks before that investor dinner in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, a woman named Tina Algretta picked up her phone. Algretta owned Algretta Electrical Corp. on Long Island. She'd borrowed money from power funding, approximately $367,000 total. And she'd already paid back roughly $700,000. But her business hit a rough patch, and she called Joe Mack to ask for help with repayment terms. [22:32] According to her testimony at Laforte's sentencing hearing, and corroborated by FBI exhibit M11, his response was this, Do you want to take this to the streets? We'll take this to the streets. I'm going to put a bomb in your car, and when you turn it on, it's going to blow, and you're going to go with it. He also threatened to kidnap her five-year-old twins. As she testified, he knew I had twins. I had children that were small at the time. They were five years old in kindergarten. He asked her if she'd ever heard of cement shoes. We'll tie them in cement shoes, she quoted him. You'll go to the bottom of the Hudson River. Figure it out. I want to be paid. After that call, according to her testimony. [23:30] Tina remote-started her car every single day. She wouldn't turn the key herself. She wouldn't let her children or anyone else get in her car first. Her husband developed such severe stress that he suffered a gastrointestinal bleed. And during his hospitalization, he had a stroke. [23:54] On December 10th, 2019, Tina called the FBI. The violence wasn't limited to phone threats and in-person confrontations. According to FBI agent Murray's testimony, par funding had industrialized harassment. They called it the bluffs. The collections team scoured Facebook and social media for personal contacts of delinquent merchants and then mailed letters to those contacts falsely stating the merchant had defaulted on a loan. The recipient might be the merchant's mother or their priest or their children's school principal. Agent Murray testified, this was probably almost the most egregious thing that these merchants had to experience. All of a sudden, everybody, their neighbor or their landlord or their neighboring businesses, now knows that they're quote, unquote, a deadbeat. PAR funding needed to install an extra server to handle the volume of outgoing bluff letters. [25:10] The intimidation campaign extended even to the lawyers trying to hold PAR funding accountable. According to court filings and testimony referenced at sentencing, Attorney Justin Proper, who'd represented defrauded borrowers, found a dead rat placed on the mailbox of his suburban home. Shane Heskin, the lawyer who'd hired the private investigator with the spy camera and whom LaForte called his arch-nemesis. Found the word prey cut from a magazine and taped to his mailbox. [25:52] These incidents were referenced in court proceedings as part of the pattern of intimidation. No one had been criminally convicted for them. Separately, according to court filings, SCC attorney Amy Riggle Berlin found her Jeep Wrangler covered in what appeared to be blood. In the summer of 2021, an incident documented as uncharged conduct with no criminal conviction for the act. There were other victims of threats. Aaron Boshart, a grocery store owner in Montana, had a par-funding representative visit his home. And according to court documents, the visitor casually mentioned Boschardt's daughter on a college track scholarship. [26:47] And what a good athlete she was, and how he should keep an eye on her. No explicit threat was needed. [26:59] Cara DiPietro owned a kitchen outfitting firm in Maryland and fell behind on payments. and Laforte texted her, get your fat ass up and call me. And when she later became a government witness, an anonymous caller using a spoofed number told her according to court filings and her testimony at sentencing. We're coming after you. We're going to split your head open. She told investigators, I was really scared. I think about it every single day multiple times a day. [27:41] While Joey was visiting merchants and Laforte was threatening borrowers, the investors still believed everything's fine. That belief rested on one thing. The books. In 2018, according to court records and the Rowan University academic analysis, Parr Funding hired an outside auditor, Friedman LLP, to audit its financial statements. And Friedman completed the audit, it showed losses. And Laforte demanded a new version. According to court findings, Friedman produced one. This version showed a $1.2 million profit. But it came with something else, an adverse opinion, a disclaimer stating that the results did not present Par Funding's financial position fairly and were not in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Laforte took the version of showing a profit, and he buried the adverse opinion. [28:51] That doctored audit was shared with investors. The disclaimer, the part that said the numbers weren't real, that was never mentioned. As the receivership's attorney later described in open court testimony, that adverse opinion letter never saw the light of day. [29:13] Meanwhile, according to the government's sentencing memoranda, Laforte's accountants in Colorado. Rodney Ermel and Kenneth Bacon They had allegedly helped hide approximately $20 million In Laforte's personal income through fabricated Shareholder loans and false bad debt deductions On his tax returns, Laforte and McKellen claimed Florida residency While living in Pennsylvania Dodging $1.6 million in state taxes, And when Laforte emailed his wife to tell her Their total wealth was $795 million According to documents entered into evidence, Her response was three words This is impressive. [30:09] On August 7, 2020, the SEC filed a civil complaint and obtained an emergency asset freeze. Appointed a receiver named Ryan Stumphauser out of Miami. And that same day, the FBI executed simultaneous search warrants on three Laforte properties. FBI, open up! At the Pennsylvania home, agents found more than $590,000 in cash. At the Poconos vacation property, another $595,000 in cash. And at the Jupiter, Florida house, more than $1.2 million in cash. Total cash seized in a single day, over $2.5 million. [31:00] And the guns. Under Laforte's bed, an AR-15 military-style rifle. In a closet, two shotguns. In every nightstand drawer and desk drawer, handguns. Seven loaded firearms total. And Joseph Laforte was a convicted felon. [31:20] And according to federal law, he could not legally possess a single round of ammunition. He told agents the guns, they all belonged to his wife. That claim was undermined, according to the pre-trial detention memo. When the FBI produced recordings of Laforte bragging to undercover agents about the arsenal at his lake house and inviting them to go shooting. The felon in possession charge came first, three years before the fraud indictment. It may have been what broke the investigation wide open. [31:59] As the receiver dug into Parr Funding's books, a pattern emerged that went far beyond the Ponzi mechanics. According to testimony from the receiver's representative at sentencing, Laforte had been funneling investors' money to a group of borrowers that the receivership team called the Exception Portfolio. [32:22] These weren't struggling small businesses. No, these were convicted criminals. The receiver described in open court Laforte's advanced tens of millions of dollars to a group of merchants that included a convicted bank fraudster, a convicted securities fraudster, a convicted healthcare fraudster, and an individual who's been charged with tax fraud. When the SEC took over in 2020, this group made up well over 50% of PAR funding's accounts receivable. The largest single borrower was a man named Stephen Odzer, approximately $93 million in outstanding loans. [33:09] Odzer had a prior federal bank fraud conviction for defrauding three banks of $16 million, a conviction that was subsequently pardoned by presidential action. And despite that public record, Laforte extended tens of millions to him. At his September 2024 guilty plea, Laforte admitted receiving approximately $9 million in what he characterized as unreported cash kickbacks from Odzer over several years. Allegations against Odzer that have not resulted in criminal charges against him in this case. The business was, as one observer put it, a fraud inside a fraud. [33:58] For the next two and a half years, receiver Ryan Stumphauser and his attorney, Alfano, worked to dismantle Laforte's empire, tracing money, cataloging assets, pursuing recovery for investors. Laforte out on bond did not go quietly. In January 2023, according to the government's sentencing memo, Laforte beat a 76-year-old former merchant client in a South Philadelphia restaurant, kicking and hitting the man while accusing him, using the memo's own language, of being a rat. And when confronted later, Laforte characterized the beating as a little boot in the rear end. But the most significant act of violence was still to come, and it was planned. [34:57] February 28, 2023, the morning begins at Joseph Laforte's estate in Pennsylvania. His brother James has slept there the night before. According to the government's detailed sentencing memo for James Laforte, the brothers drove separate cars into Center City, Philadelphia. They met with Joseph's former criminal defense attorney And they spent time in a cigar lounge A few blocks from what would become the crime scene, Joseph then took James to a youth clothing store, and James bought a second winter coat. He was already wearing one. [35:40] Joseph moved James' car to a parking garage, where it would remain hidden for days. And then Joseph drove home to his home in Pennsylvania, and he logged into a virtual SEC court hearing, a civil receivership proceeding. Attorney Alfano was on the call, representing the receiver. And the moment the hearing ended, Joseph called James. And that call lasted less than one minute. Prosecutors argued the timing was not coincidental. The content of the call was never established in evidence. But the sequence told its own story. [36:28] James LaForte walked towards Alfano's law office on 19th Street. He had surveilled which entrance Alfano used, and as Alfano later testified, if you're on the street standing in front of one entrance, you literally cannot see the other entrance. So how did James LaForte know to be waiting for me on 19th Street and not on Market Street? The answer is because the Lefortes have been stalking me for a while. [36:59] Alfano emerged from the building. James ran up from behind and struck him over the head with a hard object, later identified as possibly a flashlight recovered from the scene. Alfano went down, bleeding. Seven staples in his scalp. James ran, ditched the bloodied second coat in a trash receptacle at 20th and Market Street. And as Alfano testified He also avoided the spectacle of running around town With my blood on his jacket, That evening, according to phone records Cited in the government's memo Joseph and James spoke twice more A total of 21 minutes, Whatever they discussed, it wasn't enough Because two days later, James made the calls to Abianzo's family, the threats about the girls. [37:59] You know, I think I need to stop here for a moment because in all of my years investigating financial criminals, Ponzi schemers, embezzlers, corporate fraudsters, they lie, they manipulate, they steal. But they almost never do this. They almost never send someone to fracture a lawyer's skull because that lawyer is getting too close to returning their victim's money. Judge Kearney, at James LaForte's sentencing, called it a cowardly, fuggery act. I think the word cowardly is exactly right. LaForte sat at home, logged into a Zoom hearing, confirmed the target was on the call, then made one phone call, under a minute, and his brother did the rest. The evidence, as I read it, shows someone who managed street violence by remote control. [38:55] This wasn't a financial crime anymore. This was something entirely different. [39:05] Days after the Alfano attack, James Laforte used a spoofed number to call Perry Abanezio, a former PAR funding insider who'd become a cooperating witness and his wife. According to the government's memo, he said, retract those lies or were coming for the girls and referenced the streets where the adult daughters lived. On March 6, 2023, federal agents arrested James LaForte and in his pocket, they found a handwritten index card. On it, cell phone numbers, and family members' names and addresses, organized and handwritten. Was it a physical hit list? Well, it was in his pocket in 2023. Investigators also found James LaForte's handwritten diary. In it, a message to his newborn son. Me and Uncle Joe are putting things back together. You will see we are fighting the SEC in government. We'll talk about that when you're ready. [40:30] The original 133-page criminal indictment was unsealed in May 2023. An amended version in February 2024 added RICO charges in what prosecutors called the most serious charge we could bring against these defendants and the most righteous charge. On September 11, 2024, both Laforte brothers appeared before the judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. And when the judge asked Joseph Laforte if he'd used another name, He said, Joe Mack. And when asked if he did what the government said he did, he answered with one word. Yes. By October 2024, the CFO followed Joseph Johnny Excel Barletta, a man with no college degree, who once competed as a professional food eater at the 2013 Wing Bowl. He pleaded guilty to RICO charges. He was the man who'd fudged the numbers, cooked the books, and manipulated the financial statements at Leforte's discretion. [41:46] And on his personal laptop, seized by federal agents, were two receipts. Spreadsheets tracking in real time every dollar owed to every investor. PAR funding, $366 million. Capital source, $200 million. Fast advance funding, $7 million. Totaling over $404 million. The man running the books knew exactly how deep the hole was to the dollar. And remember that man in the King of Prussia ballroom, the one with that key fob that he bought on Amazon? Well, he was a private investigator hired by an attorney named Shane Heskin, who represented defrauded borrowers. And that key fob was a spy camera recording everything. Laforte's false claims about his own investment, his boasts about profitability, all of it captured by a $49 device in a room full of people who believed every word coming out of his mouth. And that footage was used in the criminal indictment. [43:11] Hey, if you're still with me, and I hope you are, because the sentencing hearing is coming, and it's what you need to hear. Make sure you're subscribed so you don't miss what comes next from True Crime Unheard. Remember, if you want the court documents on future cases, you have to be subscribed before the show drops. And you can subscribe at truecrimeunheard.com. [43:37] Now, that spy camera footage It was about to land in the hands of federal prosecutors. [43:49] March 26, 2025, the federal courthouse in Philadelphia, a hearing that would last 10 hours and take up 395 pages in a court transcript. [44:03] At 9.22 a.m., the proceedings began, and the first witness was called. Tina, she took the witness stand and described in open court what it was like to hold her breath every time she turned her car on for three long years. She described the threats to kidnap her kindergarten-age twins. She described the cement shoes. She described what happened to her husband. And according to the sentencing transcript, the judge listened. And then he addressed Laforte directly. You threatened a mother of six-year-old twins she remote started her car thereafter you threatened her that her six-year-old twins would not be there at school one day. [44:52] Receiver attorney Alfano, the same man who had been skullstruck and fractured his skull, took the stand. He testified that when he called the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, he found 1,800 confessions of judgment filed by HAR funding in 2018 and 2019 alone. Out of approximately 9,000 total transactions, proof of a 20% default rate that Laforte had been telling investors was less than 1%. Alfano described Laforte's victims in the plainest terms the court would hear that day. He preyed upon senior citizens. He duped a plumber from the Northeast, a baggage handler from West Philadelphia, a carpet installer from Delaware County. Out of their respective life savings. And he added, I've studied years of his emails and text messages, and I could tell you there is no sincerity in him. [45:57] Assistance United States Attorney Matthew Newcomer addressed Laforte's allocution, during which Laforte had described himself as a pain in the neck. Newcomer's response according to the transcript Pain in the neck? Is that how you've described a $400 million financial fraud extorting at least a dozen victims and attacking a member of the court being a pain in the neck? He was a menace And he continued He didn't care about those old victims He didn't care about these victims He cares about no victims He only cares about himself. Newcomer then made the point that defined the entire case. There's no nuance in hiding your name to hide your past fraudulent activity. It would have made sure no investor would have invested in par funding. Not a single investor would have invested if they knew he was a convicted fraudster. No one. At one point, according to the transcript, the judge asked Laforte, why the company had to keep going. Why couldn't he stop? And LaForte's answer? It's my ego. It's my ego. I want to be the biggest and the best. [47:27] He said it a second time, unprompted. I'm self-centered. I have a big ego, and I wanted to be the biggest and the best. And the judge said, well, that's the answer. And then you just blew by every stop sign. [47:43] And, you know, it's too dangerous for you. It's your dopamine. And every time I see cases like this, it's frustrating because people are so talented, and they use it for the wrong reasons. [47:59] At 7.14 p.m., after 10 hours of testimony, the judge pronounced the sentence. 186 months, 15 and a half years in federal prison. Restitution, almost $315 million. Forfeiture of about $121 million. Plus a private jet, a Charles Schwab investment account. Six firearms and 72 rounds of ammunition. And Laforte's last words in the courtroom, according to the transcript, Thank you, Your Honor. I appreciate everything. He was cut off. He was remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal. According to the sentencing judgment, among the forfeited assets was that Cessna citation, Sovereign 680, private jet. Tale number November 789, Mike Julia. A convicted felon who had been on supervised release when he started the company had been flying on a corporate jet bought with investors' money. Court records showed he'd spent $2.1 million on art in a single month. [49:15] His final statement before the judge interrupted him included this. I realize that all great men are not good men. And I'm going to try to move on to embrace a new path to try to be someone good. Since any life when viewed from the inside of a jail cell is a series of defeats. [49:40] James LaForte was sentenced on March 13, 2025, 137 months. 11 1⁄2 years. The judge called the Alfano attack cowardly thuggery and told him, you have no respect for the law whatsoever. According to the federal indictment out of the Eastern District of New York, a separate case, James LaForte was formerly identified as an alleged maid member of the Gambino crime family, and that case was pending as of the research date for this episode. Renato Gino Joey, the prison cellmate who became the enforcer, was sentenced in April of 2025, 18 months at a low-security medical facility because by the time of his sentencing, he was wheelchair dependent. He had cooperated with the prosecutors and his testimony was called invaluable. CFO Joseph Barletta, 66 months, five and a half years, restitution, $302 million. Laforte's wife, Lisa, the nominal CEO, pleaded guilty to tax fraud. She was sentenced in October 2025 to one day in prison and 60 days of house arrest, the last prosecution in the PAR funding case. [51:09] At her husband's sentencing, Laforte had said, Her only crime was marrying me. [51:21] Here's the part of the story that almost never happens. According to the SEC receivership's February 2026 report, $196 million has been returned to investors. The first checks arrived in January 2025, more than four years after the asset freeze. A second distribution of approximately $97 million was approved in November 2025, and for most investors, the expected recovery will be between 80% and 98% of their principal. For a Ponzi scheme, that outcome is nearly unheard of. And it happened because the receiver and his team spent five years at a cost of over $60 million in legal fees, dismantling the fraud and chasing every recoverable dollar. Joseph Brock, who invested $200,000 and followed the case through hundreds of court filings, received his first distribution in January 2025. And he told the Philadelphia Inquirer he felt numb. By November with nearly full recovery in sight he said something else sounds like Christmas to me. [52:47] Not everyone got their Christmas. The Marcus family, the Guile family, investors who came in late or through certain fund structures, some received nothing. And Laforte's court-ordered restitution of $314 million? While in prison, his minimum payment is $25 per quarter. That's $100 a year. And at that rate, it would take 3.1 million years to pay it off. Yeah, it's not going to happen. U.S. Attorney David Metcalf said it plainly. Joe Laforte is a career grifter. The judge said it differently. That tsunami of go-get-it has created a lot of victims. [53:43] Joseph Laforte wrote an email to his lawyers years before sentencing that tells you everything you need to know. I'm a winner, he wrote. I like to win at all costs, always. That's all that matters to me is winning, nothing else. [54:04] For 1,600 people, that philosophy cost half a billion dollars. For Tina, it cost three years of holding her breath every time she started her car. For Alfano, it cost seven staples in his skull. And for some investors, it cost their full retirement. And for Joseph Laforte, the man who wanted to be the biggest and the best, It costs him the next 15 and a half years of his life. He's currently incarcerated in the federal prison system. [54:43] This has been True Crime Cases You Haven't Heard. I'm Steve Rode. If this case got to you the way it got to me, you share this episode with someone who needs to hear it. If you want future detailed case files, court documents, and source materials, be sure you've subscribed to the email list at truecrimeunheard.com. And if you got an extra 10 seconds, hey, I would be honored if you'd leave me a rating or review on whatever platform you're listening on. It helps other people find these stories. And one more thing. If someone ever promises you a return that sounds too good to be true, and they won't tell you their real name, run. Until next time, stay safe. Stay curious. [55:42] Stay subscribed. Oh, and by all means, stay awesome. [55:50] Yeah. Bye.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Joseph LaForte?

Joseph LaForte is a twice-convicted felon from the Philadelphia area who founded Par Funding — formally called Complete Business Solutions Group — in 2011 while on federal supervised release. Operating under the alias 'Joe Mack,' he raised approximately $547 million from more than 1,200 investors through a fraudulent merchant cash advance scheme. On March 26, 2025, he was sentenced to 186 months (15½ years) in federal prison by Judge Mark A. Kearney in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 2:23-cr-00198-MAK.

What was Par Funding and how did the scheme work?

Par Funding (Complete Business Solutions Group, Inc.) was a Philadelphia-based merchant cash advance lender that raised approximately $547 million from investors by promising annual returns of 12 to 44 percent. Investors purchased unregistered promissory notes. Par Funding advanced that money to risky small businesses at interest rates exceeding 30 percent. According to federal court documents, by 2016 the business was losing money every year, and Joseph LaForte was using new investor money to pay existing investors — the hallmark of a Ponzi scheme. The fraud continued until the SEC obtained an emergency asset freeze on July 24, 2020.

What is a merchant cash advance, and how did Par Funding exploit it?

A merchant cash advance (MCA) is a form of short-term business financing in which a company receives a lump sum in exchange for a portion of future sales receipts. The MCA industry is largely unregulated, with no federal licensing requirement for operators. Par Funding exploited this regulatory gap by charging exorbitant rates, manipulating financial disclosures, and using threats of violence against merchants who fell behind on payments. According to court records, roughly half of Par Funding's MCA portfolio consisted of only five customers, four of which had negative net income year after year.

Who is James LaForte and what did he do in the Par Funding case?

James 'Jimmy' LaForte is the younger brother of Joseph LaForte and served as an enforcer for the Par Funding criminal enterprise. According to the government's sentencing memorandum, he threatened to kill debtors and their families, personally retrieved cash kickbacks on his brother's behalf, and on February 28, 2023, ambushed Philadelphia attorney Gaetan Alfano — who was helping the court-appointed receiver — on a Center City street, striking him from behind and leaving him with seven staples in his scalp. An index card with the names and phone numbers of government witnesses was found in James LaForte's pocket when he was arrested. He was sentenced on March 13, 2025 to 137 months (11½ years) in federal prison.

Who is Renato Gioe and what was his role?

Renato 'Gino' Gioe served as an outside debt collector and enforcer for Par Funding, working under Joseph LaForte's direction. According to federal charges, Gioe used threats of violence against merchant borrowers who fell behind on their cash advance obligations. Gioe became a cooperating government witness and was sentenced on April 17, 2025 to 18 months in federal prison with $949,000 in restitution.

What charges were filed against Joseph LaForte in the Par Funding true crime case?

Joseph LaForte was charged in Case No. 2:23-cr-00198-MAK (Eastern District of Pennsylvania) with racketeering conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), 19 counts of wire fraud, securities fraud, conspiracy to use extortionate means to collect a debt, tax evasion, failure to collect and pay over employment taxes, perjury, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, and witness retaliation. He pleaded guilty in September 2024 to the RICO conspiracy and related charges.

What was Joseph LaForte's sentence for the Par Funding fraud?

On March 26, 2025, Joseph LaForte was sentenced to 186 months (15½ years) in federal prison by Judge Mark A. Kearney in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. He was also ordered to pay more than $314 million in restitution and $120 million in forfeiture. It is one of the longest sentences for financial fraud in Pennsylvania history.

How much did Par Funding investors lose — and will they be repaid?

At the time of the SEC's July 2020 asset freeze, investors had $404,737,299 in outstanding principal. Judge Kearney determined the actual fraud loss was $288,395,088 after crediting assets recovered by the court-appointed receiver. As of February 2026, the receiver had distributed approximately $196 million to investors. The total expected recovery is approximately 80 cents on the dollar — an unusually high rate for a Ponzi scheme, made possible in part through settlements with major investor funds.

What evidence from court documents convicted the Par Funding defendants?

According to federal court documents, key evidence included CFO Joseph Cole Barleta's laptop, which tracked the fraud in real-time — showing $404,737,299 in outstanding investor principal at the time of the SEC freeze. Additional evidence included recorded phone calls of extortionate threats, an index card seized from James LaForte at the time of his arrest containing government witnesses' names and addresses, surveillance footage of the attack on attorney Gaetan Alfano, and detailed financial records showing Par Funding operated at a deficit every year from 2016 through 2020 while falsely reporting profitability to investors.

Where is Joseph LaForte now?

Joseph LaForte, 54 at the time of his March 26, 2025 sentencing, is serving a 15½-year federal prison sentence. He will not be eligible for release until he is nearly 70 years old. He also faces more than $314 million in restitution owed to defrauded investors.

What was Joseph LaForte's criminal history before Par Funding?

Joseph LaForte had two prior federal convictions before founding Par Funding. In 2006, he pleaded guilty to a $14 million real estate Ponzi scheme in New York. In 2009, he pleaded guilty to an illegal gambling conspiracy. He founded Par Funding in approximately October 2011, immediately after his release and while still serving federal supervised release, according to court records in Case No. 2:23-cr-00198-MAK.

What was the role of the SEC in the Par Funding case?

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed an emergency civil enforcement action on July 24, 2020, in the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 9:20-cv-81205), securing an immediate asset freeze and the appointment of court-appointed receiver Ryan Stumphauzer. The SEC civil case ran parallel to the federal criminal prosecution. In July 2024, Judge Rodolfo Ruiz formally ruled that Par Funding had operated as a Ponzi scheme — a finding central to the criminal loss calculation.

Who was the court-appointed receiver in the Par Funding case?

Ryan Stumphauzer of Stumphauzer Kolaya Nadler & Sloman, PLLC, was appointed as the court-ordered receiver in July 2020 following the SEC's emergency action. The receivership worked for years to identify, seize, and liquidate Par Funding's assets for the benefit of defrauded investors. As of February 2026, the receivership had distributed approximately $196 million to more than 1,200 investors.

What was the Par Funding true crime case's connection to organized crime?

The federal RICO indictment charged a criminal enterprise, and outside enforcer Renato Gioe had an alleged connection to the Gambino organized crime family — a connection Gioe denied. According to federal charging documents for James LaForte filed in New York, after Par Funding's collapse James LaForte allegedly became a member of and soldier for the Gambino organized crime family of La Cosa Nostra, with those charges remaining pending as of the Par Funding sentencing. The Par Funding prosecution itself was a RICO case — charged as racketeering conspiracy — but the government did not allege proven organizational crime membership as part of the Par Funding enterprise.

Case Timeline

Chronological sequence of key events

2006

LaForte Convicted — First Fraud Scheme

Joseph LaForte pleads guilty to a $14 million real estate Ponzi scheme in New York, his first federal fraud conviction.

2009

LaForte Convicted — Second Scheme

Joseph LaForte pleads guilty to a second federal crime: an illegal gambling conspiracy.

October 1, 2011

Par Funding Founded While LaForte Is on Supervised Release

Joseph LaForte founds Complete Business Solutions Group (Par Funding) while still serving federal supervised release. He incorporates the company in his wife Lisa McElhone's name and operates under the alias 'Joe Mack' to hide his criminal history from investors.

2012

Par Funding Begins Raising Investor Money

Par Funding begins selling promissory notes to investors, promising annual returns of 12 to 44 percent. The company claims to be a legitimate merchant cash advance lender.

2013

Renato Gioe Begins Enforcer Work

Renato 'Gino' Gioe begins working as an outside debt collector and enforcer for Par Funding at Joseph LaForte's direction, using threats of violence against merchant borrowers who fall behind.

2016

Par Funding Becomes a Ponzi Scheme

By 2016, according to federal court documents, Par Funding's merchant cash advance business is no longer profitable enough to repay investors while covering operating expenses. Joseph LaForte begins using new investor money to pay existing investors — the structure of a Ponzi scheme.

2018

Par Funding Restructures Capital Raising

Par Funding restructures its investor outreach through third-party agent funds, expanding its reach while continuing to conceal the scheme's financial reality.

March 1, 2020

Par Funding Defaults on Investor Dividends

Par Funding misses its monthly investor dividend payments, triggering investor alarm and accelerating regulatory scrutiny.

July 24, 2020

SEC Emergency Asset Freeze

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission files an emergency enforcement action in the Southern District of Florida (Case No. 9:20-cv-81205), obtaining an immediate asset freeze. Ryan Stumphauzer is appointed court-ordered receiver. Outstanding investor principal stands at $404,737,299.

August 7, 2020

FBI Arrests Joseph LaForte on Weapons Charges

FBI agents arrest Joseph LaForte at his home. Seven loaded firearms are discovered. LaForte is charged with illegal weapons possession.

October 8, 2020

LaForte Released on Pretrial Conditions

Chief Judge Tucker orders Joseph LaForte released on pretrial conditions. LaForte continues to threaten potential witnesses while free.

November 1, 2022

LaForte Threatens Witness While on Pretrial Release

Joseph LaForte threatens appraiser O.F. and his wife while on pretrial release, warning of '500 men on the streets.' The threat is reported to the FBI.

2023

LaForte Physically Attacks Customer

Joseph LaForte attacks a 76-year-old customer, S.P., in a South Philadelphia restaurant — another act of retaliation while on pretrial release.

February 28, 2023

James LaForte Bludgeons Attorney Gaetan Alfano

Minutes after a virtual receivership court hearing ends and Joseph LaForte calls his brother by phone, James LaForte ambushes Philadelphia attorney Gaetan Alfano outside his Center City law office. James strikes him from behind with a hard object, hospitalizing Alfano and requiring seven staples in his scalp. Joseph LaForte had parked his brother's car earlier that day and helped coordinate the attack.

March 6, 2023

James LaForte Arrested — Hit List Found

FBI agents arrest James LaForte outside his brother's Haverford home. An index card found in James LaForte's pocket contains the names, addresses, and phone numbers of government witnesses he threatened by phone two days after the Alfano assault.

May 18, 2023

Federal Indictment Unsealed

A federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania returns a superseding indictment against Joseph LaForte, James LaForte, and CFO Joseph Cole Barleta, Case No. 2:23-cr-00198-MAK. Charges include RICO conspiracy, wire fraud, securities fraud, extortionate debt collection, tax crimes, perjury, and obstruction.

June 1, 2023

Joseph LaForte Detained Pretrial

Judge Lloret orders Joseph LaForte detained without bail, ruling he is a danger to the community. LaForte had committed repeated acts of violence and intimidation while free on pretrial conditions.

February 26, 2024

Amended Second Superseding RICO Indictment

The grand jury returns an amended second superseding indictment (Doc. 136), adding and refining RICO charges against all three principal defendants and detailing the full structure of the criminal enterprise.

July 8, 2024

Court Rules Par Funding Was a Ponzi Scheme

Judge Rodolfo Ruiz in the Southern District of Florida civil case officially rules that Par Funding operated as a Ponzi scheme — a finding central to the criminal fraud loss calculation.

September 1, 2024

LaForte Brothers Plead Guilty; Barleta Follows in October

Joseph LaForte and James LaForte plead guilty to RICO conspiracy and related charges. CFO Joseph Cole Barleta pleads guilty in October 2024. All three acknowledge the scheme.

January 21, 2025

Judge Sets Actual Fraud Loss at $288 Million

Judge Kearney issues findings of fact and conclusions of law (Doc. 309), determining the actual fraud loss is $288,395,088 after crediting collateral recovered by the receivership from the $404,737,299 outstanding at the time of the freeze.

March 13, 2025

James LaForte Sentenced to 11½ Years

James LaForte is sentenced to 137 months (11 years and 5 months) in federal prison and ordered to pay $2.49 million in restitution.

March 26, 2025

Joseph LaForte Sentenced to 15½ Years

Joseph LaForte is sentenced to 186 months (15 and a half years) in federal prison by Judge Mark A. Kearney. He is ordered to pay more than $314 million in restitution and $120 million in forfeiture. It is one of the longest sentences for financial fraud in Pennsylvania history.

April 17, 2025

Enforcer Gioe Sentenced to 18 Months

Renato 'Gino' Gioe, who became a cooperating government witness, is sentenced to 18 months in federal prison and ordered to pay $949,000 in restitution.

June 2, 2025

CFO Barleta Sentenced to 5½ Years

Joseph Cole Barleta, Par Funding's CFO, is sentenced to 66 months (5 and a half years) in federal prison and ordered to pay $302.7 million in restitution.

October 23, 2025

Lisa McElhone Sentenced — Final Prosecution

Lisa McElhone, Joseph LaForte's wife who served as Par Funding's nominal owner, is sentenced to one day in custody and 60 days of home confinement for tax fraud. The Par Funding prosecution is now complete.

February 1, 2026

Receiver Distributes $196 Million to Investors

As of February 2026, the court-appointed receiver has distributed approximately $196 million to investors. Total expected recovery is approximately 80 cents on every dollar lost.

Primary Sources & Citations

All information verified against official court records and primary documentation

100% Verified Sources

Every fact cited in this investigation is sourced from official court documents, FBI records, or verified news archives. No speculation or unverified claims.

Primary Court Documents

  • Federal and State Court Records Official case filings and exhibits
  • FBI Affidavits and Reports Law enforcement documentation

Verified News Sources

  • News Archives Cross-referenced with official documents

For Researchers: All court documents available to email subscribers. Citations follow Bluebook legal citation format where applicable.

author avatar
Steve Rhode Podcaster - Investigator
30-year investigative journalist, former police dispatcher, and SAR pilot. Host of True Crime Cases You Haven't Heard podcast.